Ita/788/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Maruthi Buildtech Pvt.ltd
High Court
05 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/788/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Maruthi Buildtech Pvt.ltd
Date of order
05 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/788/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Maruthi Buildtech Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.|In view of the same, the appeal is dismissed as| having become infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|
ON THE Q5 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH.
AND|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.BELLUNKE
LTA NO. 788 OF 2009
BEI|WEE
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TA®™
C.R.BUILDING
QUEENS ROAD
BENGALURU
2.|THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER |OF INCOME-TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(4)C.R.BUILDINGQUEENS ROADBENGALURU
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. JEEVAN J.NEERALGI, ADVOCATE)
AND
M/S. MARUTHI BUILDTECH PVT. LTD.,NO.26, REST HOUSE ROAD|
BENGALURU RESPONDENT.
(BY SRI. A.SHANKAR AND
SRI. M.LAVA, ADVOCATES) |
This Income Tax Appeal is filed under Section 260-A|of I.T.Act, 1961 arising out of order dated 30.06.2009.passed|In|IT(SS)Ano.53/BNG/200/7,fOr|theBIOCKAssessment Period 1/4/1990 to 27/7/2000 praying that this|Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: |. formulate thesubstantial questions of law stated therein, ii. allow the)appeal and set aside the order passed by the ITATBengaluru in IT(SS)A No.53/BNG/2007, dated 30-06-2009,confirming the order of the Appellate Commissioner and)confirm the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(4), Bengaluru in the interest of|justice and equity and etc.
PK OK
Tnis Income Tax Appeal coming on for Hearing, this|day, RAVI MALIMATH J.,delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Botn learned counsels submit that the appeal be|
dismissed as having become infructuous.
2.|In view of the same, the appeal is dismissed as|
having become infructuous.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE
HJ
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue