Ita/79/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. A Shanmugasundaram
High Court
19 Dec 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/79/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. A Shanmugasundaram
Date of order
19 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/79/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. A Shanmugasundaram, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, in the absence of any substantial questionof law, the appeal is dismissed.SD/-SD/-|JUDGE |JUDGE Hence, in the absence of any substantial question kKVK
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 19 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2018.
BEFORE
THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH|
AND|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN)
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. /9 OF 201
BEI|WEE
1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX|C.R. BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BENGALURU.C.R. BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BENGALURU.
2 |THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.CIRCLE-1(1),BENGALURU.CIRCLE-1(1),BENGALURU.
_., APPELLANTS|
(BY SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE).
AND
A. SHANMUGASUNDARAMNO.5/60, BRIDGE ROAD,PALLIPALAYAM,ERODE.
.. RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL [IS FILED UNDERSECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961,|PRAYING|TO.FORMULATETHE.SUBSTANTIALQUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ALLOW|THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY.THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU|BENCH,|IN|L. | A.NO.94/BANG/200911-99-2009 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THEDEPUTY.COMMISSIONER,OFINCOME.CIRCLE-1(1), BENGALURU.
DATED
TAX,
THIS INCOME TAK APPEAL COMING ON FORORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH, J., DELIVERED|THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved py the order passed py the Tribunalremitting the matter back to the Assessing Officer for|reconsideration and to take an appropriate decision,|after the Hon’‘ble High Court passes judgment inIncome Tax Appeal No.1029 of 2006, the presentappeal is filed.
2. It is submitted at the Bar thnat Income Tax!Appeal No.1029 of 2006 has since been disposed off.Based on the same, the Assessing Officer nas to
3
reconsidertne matter|afresh.Undertnesecircumstances, we do not find any substantial question
of law that arises for consideration in this appeal.
Hence, in the absence of any substantial questionof law, the appeal is dismissed.SD/-SD/-|JUDGE |JUDGE
Hence, in the absence of any substantial question
kKVK
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue