Case LawHigh Court › Ita/79/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Ta...

Ita/79/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Cent-2 v. Babushka Promoters (P) Ltd

High Court 01 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/79/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Cent-2 v. Babushka Promoters (P) Ltd
Date of order
01 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/79/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Cent-2 v. Babushka Promoters (P) Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: Recording the aforesaid statement, the appeal is disposed of, without answering the issue/question raised, which is left open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 79/2018 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENT-2 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashook K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Aditya and Mr. Aman, Advocates. versus BABUSHKA PROMOTERS (P) LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P.C. Yadav and Mr. P.K. Bansal, Advocates. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R% 01.10.2018 Learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue states that the tax effect in the present appeal is below Rs.50 lacs and, therefore, in terms of Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018 the appeal may be disposed of without examining and deciding the issue/question raised. It may be clarified that the issue/question is left open. Recording the aforesaid statement, the appeal is disposed of, without answering the issue/question raised, which is left open. If the present appeal falls under exception, it will be open to the Revenue to file an application for revival. SANJIV KHANNA, J. OCTOBER 01, 2018/MR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan