Ita/808/2008 Of The Director Of Income Tax v. Bangalore University
High Court
04 Jun 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/808/2008 Of The Director Of Income Tax v. Bangalore University
Date of order
04 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/808/2008 Of The Director Of Income Tax v. Bangalore University, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4 DAY OF JUNE, 2009
PRESENT
HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE V.GOPALAGOWDA
AND
HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH|
ITA NO 808 OF 2008
BHITWER
1.|THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME - TAX,
EXEMPTIONS,
C.R. BUILDING,
QUEENS ROAD,
BENGALURU.
2.|THR DEPUTY DRIECTOR OF INCOME TAX
(EXEMPTIONS),
CIRCLE 17(1), C.R.BUILDING,|
QUEENS ROAD,
BENGALURU.
... APPELLANT (5)
(By Sri. M.V. SESHACHALA, ADVOCATE)
2.
ITA No.808/2008 2
AN
BANGALORE UNIVERSITY,
JNANABHARATHI,
BBNGALURU — 560 056.
... RESPONDENT
The advocate for the appellant has filed the above ITA.Under Sec.260-A of Income Tax Act 1961, arising out of orderdated 28.03.2008 passed in ITA No.398/Beng/2007, for theAssessment year 2004-05, praying this Hon'ble Court to:
1. formulate the substantial questions of law stated above.
11. allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by theITAT, Bengaluru in ITA No.398/Beng/2007 dated 28.03.2008confirming the order of the Appellate Commissioner confirmthe order passed by the Deputy Director of Income Tax,(Exemp) Circle-17(1), Bengaluru.
This ITA is coming on for Orders, this day, the Courtmade the following:
>; se
ORDER
One week’s time is granted to the appellant to complywith office objections, failing which, the appeal shall bedeemed to be rejected without reference to the Bench.
Sd/-.JUDGE|Sd/-.JUDGETy. By : H.M.N|R. By: V.KC. By: D.P.S)CopyTy.Date : 22/01/15C. Date : 22/01/15)od/-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue