Ita/811/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Shri.k.p.karthikeyan, Tripunithura
High Court
07 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/811/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Shri.k.p.karthikeyan, Tripunithura
Date of order
07 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/811/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Shri.k.p.karthikeyan, Tripunithura, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Consequently appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
FRIDAY, THE 7TH AUGUST 2009 / 16TH SRAVANA 1931
ITA.No. 811 of 2009()
---------------------
ITA.203/2003 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT:
------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT:
--------------------------
SRI.K.P.KARTHIKEYAN,
KURAVANPARAMBIL, UDAYAMPEROOR, TRIPUNITHURA.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 07/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
....................................................................I.T. Appeal Nos.811 of 2009
....................................................................Dated this the 7th day of August, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Heard Senior counsel appearing for the appellant. Questionraised pertains to cancellation of unexplained trade credits added in theassessment by the first appellate authority and confirmed by theTribunal. Even though Standing Counsel contended that the creditworthiness of the parties were not proved by the assessee, it is seen thatall the credits pertain to business transactions in illicit liquor trade andall the creditors have confirmed transactions before the AssessingOfficer. We do not find any substantial question of law arising fromthe orders of the Tribunal. Consequently appeal is dismissed.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
C.K.ABDUL REHIM Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.