Ita/81/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. N.k. Ashraf
High Court
26 Feb 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/81/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. N.k. Ashraf
Date of order
26 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/81/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. N.k. Ashraf, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
TUESDAY ,THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1940
ITA.No. 79 of 2014
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 275/2009 ofI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 22-06-2011
APPELLANT/S:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CALICUT.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT/S:
N.K.ASHRAF,KUHIPARI BUILDING, CHEROOTY ROAD, CALICUT- 673 032.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.GOPINATH (SR.)SRI.P.BENNY THOMASSRI.JOSON MANAVALANSRI.K.JOHN MATHAISRI.KURYAN THOMASSRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
OTHER PRESENT:
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON26.02.2019, ALONG WITH ITA.80/2014, ITA.81/2014, ITA.82/2014, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
TUESDAY ,THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1940
ITA.No. 80 of 2014
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 276/2009 ofI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 22-06-2011
APPELLANT/S:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CALICUT.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT/S:
N.K. ASHRAF,KUHIPARI BUILDING, CHEROOTY ROAD, CALICUT - 673 032.BY ADVS.SRI.P.GOPINATH (SR.)SRI.P.BENNY THOMASSRI.JOSON MANAVALANSRI.K.JOHN MATHAISRI.KURYAN THOMASSRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON26.02.2019, ALONG WITH ITA.82/2014, ITA.81/2014, ITA.79/2014,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
TUESDAY ,THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1940
ITA.No. 81 of 2014
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 271/2009 ofI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 22-06-2011
APPELLANT/S:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CALICUT.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT/S:
N.K. ASHRAF,KUNHIPARI BUILDING, CHEROOTY ROAD, CALICUT - 673 032.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.GOPINATH (SR.)SRI.P.BENNY THOMASSRI.JOSON MANAVALANSRI.K.JOHN MATHAISRI.KURYAN THOMASSRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON26.02.2019, ALONG WITH ITA.82/2014, ITA.80/2014, ITA.79/2014,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
TUESDAY ,THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1940
ITA.No. 82 of 2014
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 272/2009 ofI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 22-06-2011
APPELLANT/S:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CALICUT.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT/S:
N.K. ASHRAF,KUNHIPARI BUILDING, CHEROOTY ROAD, CALICUT - 673 032.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.GOPINATH (SR.)SRI.P.BENNY THOMASSRI.JOSON MANAVALANSRI.K.JOHN MATHAISRI.KURYAN THOMASSRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON26.02.2019, ALONG WITH ITA.81/2014, ITA.80/2014, ITA.79/2014,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
[ ITA 79/2014 ,ITA.80/2014 ,ITA.81/2014 ,ITA.82/2014 ]
Vinod Chandran, J.
The appeals were filed from the order giving effectto a direction issued under Section 263 of the IncomeTax Act, 1961. The order under Section 263 itself wasstuck down by the Tribunal and against which an appealwas filed before this Court, which was withdrawn by theRevenue, based on the litigation policy. In suchcircumstances, nothing survives in the above appealsand the same would stand rejected. No costs.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN
JUDGE
dkr
Sd/-
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON26.02.2019, ALONG WITH ITA.81/2014, ITA.80/2014, ITA.79/2014,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
[ ITA 79/2014 ,ITA.80/2014 ,ITA.81/2014 ,ITA.82/2014 ]
Vinod Chandran, J.
The appeals were filed from the order giving effectto a direction issued under Section 263 of the IncomeTax Act, 1961. The order under Section 263 itself wasstuck down by the Tribunal and against which an appealwas filed before this Court, which was withdrawn by theRevenue, based on the litigation policy. In suchcircumstances, nothing survives in the above appealsand the same would stand rejected. No costs.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN
JUDGE
dkr
Sd/-
ASHOK MENONJUDGE
APPENDIX OF ITA 79/2014
APPELLANT'S/S ANNEXURES:
APPENDIX OF ITA 80/2014
APPELLANT'S/S ANNEXURES:
APPENDIX OF ITA 81/2014
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE CORDER OF THE CIT(A) RESTORING THE ORIGINALASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 18/02/2009.ANNEXURE DORDER OF THE ITAT DISMISSING THE APPEAL OFTHE DEPARTMENT DATED 22/06/2011.
APPENDIX OF ITA 82/2014
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE ACOPY OF ORDER ASSESSMENT ORDER U/S. 143R.W.S. 263 DATED 05/12/2008.ANNEXURE BCOPY OF THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED30/01/2009.ANNEXURE CORDER OF THE CIT(A) RESTORING THE ORIGINALASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 18/02/2009.ANNEXURE DORDER OF THE ITAT DISMISSING THE APPEAL OFTHE DEPARTMENT DATED 22/06/2011.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.