Case LawHigh Court › Ita/8/2007 Of The Fertilisers And The Ch...

Ita/8/2007 Of The Fertilisers And The Chemicals Travancore Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 02 Nov 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/8/2007 Of The Fertilisers And The Chemicals Travancore Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
02 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/8/2007 Of The Fertilisers And The Chemicals Travancore Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Issue: The only issue arising in the above appeal isas to whether the foreseeable loss in contractcould be claimed as a deduction before thecontract is concluded, considering the liabilityascertained at the various stages.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON FRIDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 11TH KARTHIKA, 1940 ITA. No.8 of 2007 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA NO.464/2005 OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATETRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH DATED 26-06-2006 APPELLANT/APPELLANT: THE FERTILISERS AND THE CHEMICALS TRAVANCORE LTD.,UDYOGAMANDAL. BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIRSRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR (SR.) RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOCHI SRI PKR MENON SR FOR GOI TAXES THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02.11.2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ITA. No.8 of 2007 JUDGMENT K. Vinod Chandran, J. The only issue arising in the above appeal isas to whether the foreseeable loss in contractcould be claimed as a deduction before thecontract is concluded, considering the liabilityascertained at the various stages. We have alreadyheld against the very same appellant in ITA No.43of 2003 by judgment dated 09.10.18. We hence follow the aforesaid judgment andreject the above appeal answering the question infavour of the Revenue and against the assessee. Sd/-K. VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE Sd/- ASHOK MENON JUDGE sp/07/11/18 //True CopyP.A. To Judge ITA. No.8 of 2007 APPENDIX OF ITA 8/2007 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan