Case LawHigh Court › Ita/8/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax...

Ita/8/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S M.p. Madhyam 40 Administrative Zone Arera Hills

High Court 10 Dec 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Ita/8/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S M.p. Madhyam 40 Administrative Zone Arera Hills
Date of order
10 Dec 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/8/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S M.p. Madhyam 40 Administrative Zone Arera Hills, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

10/12/2013 I.T.A. No.8/2010 Shri Sanjay Lal, learned counsel for the appellant/Revenue. He is heard on the question of admission. Challenge in this appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is made to an order passed by the Indore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in I.T.A. No.237/2009 on 17.7.2009. It is an admitted position that the controversy involved in this appeal and the legal question stands concluded by a judgment rendered by this Court in Case No. ITA No.14/2011. In that view of the matter it is not appropriate now to interfere as the question has already been answered against the Revenue in the aforesaid case. In view of the aforesaid, we see no reason to interfere in the matter. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. (Rajendra Menon) (A.K. Sharma)JudgeJudge PK
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan