Ita/8/2013 Of Smt Archana Kumari v. The Income Tax Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19[TH|]DAY OF JANUARY 2071 PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND| THE HON’‘’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASW A BETWEEN: 1LT.A. NO.8 OF 2013 SMI. ARCHANA KUMARI#142, PURVA PARKRIDGE GARUDACHARPALYABENGALURU-560048| (BY MR. SHARATH S, ADV., FOR.MR. CHYTHANYA K.K. ADV.,) .... APPELLAN/ AND* THE INCOME TAX OFFICER| WARD-5(3), BENGALURU. (BY MR. DILIP KUMAR, ADV., FOR MR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) | .., RESPONDENT THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. 260-A OF INCOME TAX|ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 21.09.2012 PASSEDIN ITA NO.225/BANG/2012 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08,PRAYING TO: | (1) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW.STATED THEREIN. | (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER (TO.THE EXTENT PREJUDICIAL TO THE APPELLANT) OF THE ITAT,.BANGALORE ‘A’ BENCH, BEARING ITA NO.225/BANG/2012 DATED21.09.2012. THIS I.7T.A. COMING ON FOR’ HEARING, THIS’ DAY, | ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: | JUDGMENT Mr.Sharath S, learned counsel for Mr.Chythanya K.K.,.learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for Mr.K.V.Aravind,|learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo'seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Theaforesaid memo is taken on record. 2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal isaismissed as withdrawn. Sd/-JUDGE Sd/-JUDGE