Ita/8/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ask Brothers Ltd
High Court
04 Dec 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/8/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ask Brothers Ltd
Date of order
04 Dec 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/8/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ask Brothers Ltd, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this regard, a memo is also filed today|which is taken on record. oD Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATEKBD THIS THE DAY OF DBCBMBER 2015
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA
ITA NO.8/2015
BETWEEN:
1]THR COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME-TAX
CRNTRAL CIRCLE
C R BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD|
BANGALORE.
2 |THE DBRPUTY COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME-TAX|
CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), —
C R BUILDING, QUEEN’S ROADBANGALORE-560 OO 1.BANGALORE-560 OO 1.
.. APPELLANT
(BY SRI K V ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND:
M/S ASK BROTHERS LTD..,(THE ATRIA) NO.1-PALACK ROADBANGALORE-560001PAN:AABCA2386D.
~_ RKBSPONDE
(BY SRI. A. SHANKAR, ADV.)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO SET)ASIDHK THR ORDBRS PASSHD BY THE INCOME-TAXAPPBRLLATETRIBUNAL,BANGALOREIN|ITA|NO.1075/BANG/ 2006DATED:22.08.2014ANT)CONFIRMTHE.ORDER|OF|THE.APPBRLLATECOMMISSIONERCONFIRMINGTHE.ORDER|PASSBKHD BY THR DBPUTY COMMISSIONBR OINCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), BANGALORE.
THIS APPKBAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSIONTHIS DAY,VINEET SARAN J., DELIVERED THE!RFOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
At the outset, Sr. K.V. Aravind, learned
Counsel for the Appellants has made a request that|the appellants may be permitted to withdraw this|appeal. In this regard, a memo is also filed today|which is taken on record.
oD Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
AN /-
Sd/-|JUDGE
Sd/-|JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.