Case LawHigh Court › Ita/8/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax...

Ita/8/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Taxexemption v. Saraswati Sishu Vidya Mandir

High Court 11 Dec 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Ita/8/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Taxexemption v. Saraswati Sishu Vidya Mandir
Date of order
11 Dec 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/8/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Taxexemption v. Saraswati Sishu Vidya Mandir, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, the appeal, being devoid of merits, deserves to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

02. 11.12.2019 Heard Mr. R.S. Chiminka, learned Sr. Standing Counsel along with Shri A. Kedia, learned Standing Counsel for the appellant-Income Tax Department. 2. By way of this appeal the Income Tax Department has challenged the order dated 15.02.2017 passed by learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in ITA No.30/CTK/2016 vide Annexure-2, allowing the appeal preferred by the assessee-respondent. 3. Perused the impugned order in detail. Learned Tribunal while allowing the appeal at paragraph-6 of its order dated 15.02.2017 has observed as under: “6. We find that in the instant case, the registration of the society u/s.12AA was rejected by the CIT (Exemptions) on the ground that the assessee has not registered amended clauses, inter alia, amendment & winding up clauses with Registrar of Societies, after passing the resolution and in the absence of such registration, such amended clauses cannot be cognizance of. Ld A.R. of the assessee has relied on the decision of the Mumbai E” Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Tara Educational and Charitable Trust (supra), wherein, the Tribunal has allowed registration on similar facts of the case. Ld D.R. could not show any good reason to not to follow the above quoted order of the Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal. Therefore, respectfully following the decision of the Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Tara Educational and Charitable Trust (supra) we set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income (Exemptions), Hyderabad and direct him to grant registration u/s.12AA of the Act.” 4. Considering the submission made and keeping in view the observations made by the learned Tribunal as quoted above, we are in complete agreement with the view taken by the learned Tribunal in the impugned order and find no case is made out to interfere with the same. Akk 5. Hence, the appeal, being devoid of merits, deserves to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed. All connected Misc. Case(s)/I.A(s) if any, is/are accordingly dismissed. .…….......……………… ( K.S. Jhaveri ) Chief Justice …………………..……… (K.R.Mohapatra) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan