Ita/8/2018 Of Rayin Haji.k v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appealsii)
High Court
05 Jan 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/8/2018 Of Rayin Haji.k v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appealsii)
Date of order
05 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/8/2018 Of Rayin Haji.k v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appealsii), the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appealon the same cause of action. kp True copy P.A.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
TUESDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 15TH POUSHA, 1942
ITA.No.08 OF 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 564/COCH/2004 DATED 10-08-2017 OF THEINCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,KOCHI
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/ASSESEE:
RAYIN HAJI.K.KOOTHRADAN HOUSE,MUNDUPARAMPA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676 509.BY ADVS.SRI.A.KUMARSRI.P.J.ANILKUMARSMTG.MINI(1748)SRI.P.S.SREE PRASAD
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE:
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS II)AAYAKAR BHAVAN (NORTH BLOCK), KOZHIKODE - 673 001.
ADV.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON05.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Shaffique, J
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 5[th] day of January, 2021
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant hadalready approached the competent authority for settling the matterand therefore there is no necessity to proceed with the appeal onmerits and seeks permission to withdraw the appeal with liberty toapproach this Court on the same cause of action.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appealon the same cause of action.
kp
True copy P.A. To Judge
Sd/-
A.M.SHAFFIQUEJUDGESd/-
GOPINATH P.JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.