Case LawHigh Court › Ita/82/2012 Of Comnr.of Income Tax v. Sa...

Ita/82/2012 Of Comnr.of Income Tax v. Sarmistha Rath

High Court 20 Nov 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Ita/82/2012 Of Comnr.of Income Tax v. Sarmistha Rath
Date of order
20 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/82/2012 Of Comnr.of Income Tax v. Sarmistha Rath, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

04. 20.11.2019 MP ITA No.82 of 2012 & I.A. No.133 of 2019 Heard learned Sr. Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department-appellant. The above I.A. has been filed for condonation of delay of 4 days in filing the appeal. The order of the learned Tribunal challenged in the appeal was passed on 25.04.2012. It appears that the said application for condonation of delay has been moved on 18.11.2019 i.e. seven years after the filing of the appeal on 27.08.2012 and only moved after the order passed by this Court on 04.11.2019. In our considered opinion, it will not be appropriate to issue notice on the question of limitation after seven years. Hence, the I.A. stands dismissed. Accordingly, the ITA is dismissed on the ground of limitation. It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and even this order shall not be treated as precedent for the Tribunal as having confirmed the impugned order by this Court. .…….......……………… ( K.S. Jhaveri ) Chief Justice …………………..……… (K.R.Mohapatra) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan