Case LawHigh Court › Ita/823/2017 Of Smt Gayathri Chhabra v....

Ita/823/2017 Of Smt Gayathri Chhabra v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 27 Jan 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/823/2017 Of Smt Gayathri Chhabra v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
27 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/823/2017 Of Smt Gayathri Chhabra v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2/[TH|]DAY OF JANUARY 2071| PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND| THE HON’‘’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASW A BETWEEN: ILT.A. NO.823 OF 2017 SMI. GAYATHRI CHHABRA.W/O SRI NAVAL KUMAR CHHABRAAGED 65 YEARS|A-162/163, SOBHA IVORYST. JOHNS ROADNAGA GHEATRE ROADBANGALORE-5600427. (BY MRS. R. PRATIBHA, ADV., FOR>MR. S. PARTHASARATHI, ADV.,) | .... APPELLAN/ AND* THE INCOME TAX OFFICER|WARD-8(1), BANGALOREPRESENTLY: INCOME-TAX OFFICER.WARD 1(2)(3), BMTC BUILDING4TH FLOOR, 6TH BLOCKKORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560095.| .. RESPONDENT| (BY MR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. J6O0-A OF INCOME TAXACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 13.01.2017 PASSEDIN ITA NO.196/BANG/2015 AND MP NO.90/BANG/2017 DATED14.07.2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05, PRAYING TO: — (1) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW,STATED ABOVE. (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE,INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED: 13.01.2017 ARISING|OUT OF ITA NO.196/BANG/2015 AND MP NO.90/BANG/2017DATED 14.7.201/7 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05. (il)PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THISHON BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT ON THE FACTS ANDCIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE [IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICEAND EQUITY. THIS|I.7T.A. COMING ONFORORDERS,THISDAY,ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: | JUDGMENT Smt.R.Prathiba, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for Mr.K.V.Aravind,| jearned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo' seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The aforesaid memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/-JUDGE Sd/-.JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan