Case LawHigh Court › Ita/830/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/830/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Wipro Finance Pvt Ltd

High Court 16 Oct 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/830/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Wipro Finance Pvt Ltd
Date of order
16 Oct 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/830/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Wipro Finance Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU DATED THIS THR 16 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015 PRESENT THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK VINEBT SARAN| AND THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA| ITA NO.830/2009 BETWEEN: 1.THR COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING,| QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE. 2.THR DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX.CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3),CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE. _ APPELLANTS (BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADV..,) ANT) WIPRO FINANCEK PRIVATE LIMITEDWIPRO CENTRE, NO.9,PAPANNA STREET,ST.MARKS ROAD CROSS,BANGALORE.| _ RESPONDENT (BY MS. S.R.ANURADHA, ADV..,) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF LT.|ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED /7.8.2009PASSED>INITA|NO.1244/BNG/2008,KORTHEASSKSSMEBNTYRKAR1999-2000, PRAYING|1 KFORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW|STATED THEREIN, Il. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDETHR ORDBR PASSHD BY THR ITAT BANGALORE IN ITA] TO NO.1244/BNG/2008 DATED 7.8.2009 AND CONFIRM THE|ORDER OF THR APPELLATHKH COMMISSIONER CONFIRMINTHR ORDER PASSEKD BY THER DBPUTY COMMISSIONBR OINCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), BANGALORE. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, VINEET SARAN J.,DELIVERED THR FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Heard Sri K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for theappellants as well as Ms.8S.R.Anuradha, learned counsel forthe respondent and perused the record. 2.Learned counsel for the parties have jointly|stated that challenging the same order of the Tribunal,|which is impugned in this appeal, another appeal being |ITA No.831/2009 was filed raising the same question of law,which has been raised in this appeal and by judgment andorder dated 07.06.2010 passed by the Division Bench of thisCourt, the appeal filed by the Revenue has been dismissed. 3.Accordingly, for the reasons given in _ thjudgment dated 07.06.2010 passed in ITA No.831/2009, thisappeal also standsdismissed.No order as to costs. TTL Sd/- | JUDGE| Sd/-. JUDGE|
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan