Ita/831/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -5 v. Li & Fung ( India ) Pvt. Ltd
High Court
13 Sep 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/831/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -5 v. Li & Fung ( India ) Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
13 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/831/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -5 v. Li & Fung ( India ) Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~52.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 831/2019 and C.M. No. 40954/2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -5
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate.
versus
LI & FUNG ( INDIA ) PVT. LTD.
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Neeraj Jain, Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal and Ms. Devika Jain, Advocates.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R% 13.09.2019
The Department has preferred the present appeal to assail the order dated 21.02.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No. 1470/Del/2016 relating to assessment year 2011-12. The order passed by the Tribunal relates to the same assessee in respect of the other assessment years as well with which we are not concerned.
A perusal of the impugned order shows that the same is premised on an earlier order passed by this Court in ITA No. 674/2016 dated 05.09.2016 in the case of the respondent assessee itself. Since the issue is squarely covered by the said decision of this Court, we are not inclined to entertain
the present appeal.
Dismissed.
SEPTEMBER 13, 2019 kd
VIPIN SANGHI, J
SANJEEV NARULA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.