Case LawHigh Court › Ita/83/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Ta...

Ita/83/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Bhopal v. Smt. Tripti Agrawal

High Court 28 Apr 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Ita/83/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Bhopal v. Smt. Tripti Agrawal
Date of order
28 Apr 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/83/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Bhopal v. Smt. Tripti Agrawal, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Appeal is also dismissed in view of the above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

I.T.A. No. 83/2011 28.04.2014. Calling in question the tenability of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 30/12/2010 this appeal has been filed. Exemption from filing certified copy sought for on the ground that the same has been filed in I.T.A. No. 85/11. Keeping in view the aforesaid, exemption as prayed for, is allowed. Learned counsel for the appellant Shri Sanjay Lal is heard on the question of admission against the same impugned order and against the same respondent/Assesse. I.T.A. No. 85/2011 was also filed by the Department under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act and by a detailed order passed by us on 23.01.2014, the said appeal has been dismissed on the ground that no substantial question of law arises for consideration in the appeal. On the ground of reason already indicated in a detailed order passed by us on 23.01.2014, we see no reasons to make any further indulgence in the matter. Appeal is also dismissed in view of the above. (Rajendra Menon) Judge (A.K.Sharma) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan