Case LawHigh Court › Ita/833/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/833/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Wipro Finance Pvt Ltd

High Court 16 Oct 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/833/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Wipro Finance Pvt Ltd
Date of order
16 Oct 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/833/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Wipro Finance Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU DATED THIS THR 16 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015 PRESENT THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK VINEBT SARAN| AND THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA| ITA NO.833/2009 BETWEEN: 1.THR COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING,| QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE. 2.THR DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX.CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3),CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE. _ APPELLANTS (BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADV..,) ANT) WIPRO FINANCEK PRIVATE LIMITEDWIPRO CENTRE, NO.9,PAPANNA STREET,ST.MARKS ROAD CROSS,BANGALORE.| _ RESPONDENT (BY MS. S.R.ANURADHA, ADV..,) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION JZ6O0A OF LI.ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED /7.8.2009PASSED>INITA|NO.1247/BNG/2008,KORTHEASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05, PRAYING TO 1. FORMULATETHBKSUBSTANTIALQUESTIONS.OF|LAWSTATEHKTHEREIN, Hl. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE|ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAL BANGALORE IN ITA]NO.1247/BNG/2008 DATED 7.8.2009 AND CONFIRM THE| ORDER OF THR APPBLLATK COMMISSIONBR CONFIRMINGTHER ORDER PASSED BY THE DBEPULY COMMISSIONER OINCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(3), BANGALORE. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY,VINEET SARAN J.,DELIVBRED THR FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Heard Sri K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for theappellants as well as Ms.8S.R.Anuradha, learned counsel forthe respondent and perused the record. 2.Learned counsel for the parties have jointly|stated that challenging the same order of the Tribunal,|which is impugned in this appeal, another appeal being ITANo.831/2009 was filed raising the same question of law,|which has been raised in this appeal and by judgment andorder dated 07.06.2010 passed by the Division Bench of thisCourt, the appeal filed by the Revenue has been dismissed. 3.|Accordingly, for the reasons given in _ thjudgment dated 07.06.2010 passed in ITA No.831/2009, thisappeal also standsdismissed.No order as to costs. TTL Sd/- | JUDGE| od/-. JUDGE|
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan