Ita/833/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Wipro Finance Pvt Ltd
High Court
16 Oct 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/833/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Wipro Finance Pvt Ltd
Date of order
16 Oct 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/833/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Wipro Finance Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU
DATED THIS THR 16 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015
PRESENT
THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK VINEBT SARAN|
AND
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA|
ITA NO.833/2009
BETWEEN:
1.THR COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME-TAX
CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING,|
QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE.
2.THR DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX.CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3),CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3),
C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,
BANGALORE.
_ APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADV..,)
ANT)
WIPRO FINANCEK PRIVATE LIMITEDWIPRO CENTRE, NO.9,PAPANNA STREET,ST.MARKS ROAD CROSS,BANGALORE.|
_ RESPONDENT
(BY MS. S.R.ANURADHA, ADV..,)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION JZ6O0A OF LI.ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED /7.8.2009PASSED>INITA|NO.1247/BNG/2008,KORTHEASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05, PRAYING TO 1. FORMULATETHBKSUBSTANTIALQUESTIONS.OF|LAWSTATEHKTHEREIN, Hl. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE|ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAL BANGALORE IN ITA]NO.1247/BNG/2008 DATED 7.8.2009 AND CONFIRM THE|
ORDER OF THR APPBLLATK COMMISSIONBR CONFIRMINGTHER ORDER PASSED BY THE DBEPULY COMMISSIONER OINCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(3), BANGALORE.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY,VINEET SARAN J.,DELIVBRED THR FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for theappellants as well as Ms.8S.R.Anuradha, learned counsel forthe respondent and perused the record.
2.Learned counsel for the parties have jointly|stated that challenging the same order of the Tribunal,|which is impugned in this appeal, another appeal being ITANo.831/2009 was filed raising the same question of law,|which has been raised in this appeal and by judgment andorder dated 07.06.2010 passed by the Division Bench of thisCourt, the appeal filed by the Revenue has been dismissed.
3.|Accordingly, for the reasons given in _ thjudgment dated 07.06.2010 passed in ITA No.831/2009, thisappeal also standsdismissed.No order as to costs.
TTL
Sd/- |
JUDGE|
od/-.
JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.