In Ita/84/2017 Of Nilachal Educational Truist v. Principal Chidf Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
07. 17.03.2021
M. Panda
ITA No.84 of 2017 and I.A. No.16 of 2021
1. Mr. R. Chimanka, learned Senior Standing Counsel files memo of appearance for the Income Tax Department-Respondent in Court today, which is taken on record. memo of appearance for the Income Tax Department-Respondent in Court today, which is taken on record.
2. The aforesaid I.A. has been filed by the Appellant for withdrawal of the Appeal. withdrawal of the Appeal.
2. Considering the averments stated therein, the application for withdrawal of the Appeal is allowed. withdrawal of the Appeal is allowed.
3. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
( Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice Chief Justice
( B.P. Routray ) Judge Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.