Ita/84/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. M/S Cornerstone
High Court
14 Nov 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/84/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. M/S Cornerstone
Date of order
14 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
2006-2007
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/84/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. M/S Cornerstone, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the above, this appeal is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signed byANUSHA VLocation: HighCourt Of Karnataka
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 84 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
1. PR. COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX -1
BMTC COMPLEX KORMANGALA BANGALORE
2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2) BANGALORE …APPELLANTS
(BY SHRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S. CORNERSTONE PROPERTIES PRIVATE LTD. I AND II FLOOR, NO.540 C M H ROAD, INDIRA NAGAR BANGALORE-560 038.
PAN- …RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI. A. SHANKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 08.09.2017 PASSED IN ITA NO.1714/BANG/2013, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-2007, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 08.09.2017 PASSED BY THE INCOME
TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'B' BENCH, BANGALORE, AS SOUGHT FOR AND ETC.,
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filedby the Revenue, challenging order dated 08[th]September, 2017 in ITA No.1714/Bang/2013 for the Assessment Year 2006-2007.
2. Heard Shri E.I.Sanmathi, learned Standing Counsel for the Revenue and Shri A.Shankar, learned Senior Advocate for the respondent.
3. Shri A.Shankar, learned Senior Advocate submits that the tax effect is less than Rs.1 Crore and the same is not disputed by Shri Sanmathi.
4. In view of the above, this appeal is disposed of.
No costs.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
AV
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.