Ita/849/2017 Of Smt. Padmavathy Krishna v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
19 Jun 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/849/2017 Of Smt. Padmavathy Krishna v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
19 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/849/2017 Of Smt. Padmavathy Krishna v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signed byMALA K NLocation: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA
NC: 2023:KHC:21345-DBITA No. 849 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19 DAY OF JUNE, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 849 OF 2017
BETWEEN:
SMT. PADMAVATHY KRISHNA, "SRINIVASANILAYA", # 263, 6TH A CROSS, 15TH MAIN, RMV EXTENSION, BENGALURU - 560 080. PAN:AKVP02312H
…APPELLANT (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR V., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE) AND:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2(3), C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SANMATHI E.I., STANDING COUNSEL FOR SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, SR. STANDING COUNSEL)
- 2 -
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED: 30.06.2017 PASSED IN ITA NO'S. 1231 & 1232/BANG/2013, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2006-07 AND 2007-08, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND THE ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,P.S. DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sri V.Chandrashekar V, learned Advocate for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal keeping open the substantial questions of law to be raised in appropriate case. He has filed a memo of even date to the said effect.
2. Leave granted. Memo be kept in the record.
3. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Substantial questions of law are kept open for
consideration in appropriate case.
No costs.
SD/- JUDGE
SD/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.