Ita/85/1995 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Nagpur v. M/S Abhijit Iron Processors Pvt Ltd
High Court
21 Apr 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Ita/85/1995 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Nagpur v. M/S Abhijit Iron Processors Pvt Ltd
Date of order
21 Apr 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/85/1995 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Nagpur v. M/S Abhijit Iron Processors Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
-INCOMETAX APPLICATION NO. 85 OF 1995
Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. APRIL 21, 2007.
Heard Shri Jaiswal, learned counsel
for the applicant and Shri Dewani, learned counsel for the respondent.
This reference application is filed by
the revenue under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, stating that the following question of law is arising out of the order of the Tribunal.
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in upholding the order of the CIT(A) directing the Assessing Officer to allow the assessee necessary relief under section 80-I of the Act subject to satisfaction of the other condition ?”
The learned counsel for the applicant as well as respondent fairly state that in the case of the assessee for earlier year, similar
application made by the revenue has been allowed. Accordingly present application is also allowed. The Tribunal is directed to forward the statement of the case for the opinion of this Court as early as possible for the opinion of this Court. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
*GS.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.