Case LawHigh Court › Ita/869/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/869/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Plant Lipkds Pvt Ltd

High Court 10 Feb 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/869/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Plant Lipkds Pvt Ltd
Date of order
10 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/869/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Plant Lipkds Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Following theabove judgment we dismiss these appeals also filed by the Revenue.Registry will attach a copy of judgment in I.T.A.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 21ST MAGHA 1931 ITA.No. 869 of 2009() --------------------- ITA.333/COCH/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT ----------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT: --------------- PLANT LIPIDS PVT.LTD., KADAYIRUPPU P.O.,KOLENCHERRY. ADV. SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS FOR R1 THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ALONG WITH ITA NOS.935, 966 & 1109/2009 ON 10/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. .................................................................... I.T. Appeal Nos.869,935,966 & 1109 of 2009 ....................................................................Dated this the 10th day of February, 2010. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. The very same decision followed by the Tribunal in decidingthese appeals in favour of the assessee stands confirmed by judgmentof this court in I.T.A. Nos.353 and 1226 of 2009 dated 18.11.2009wherein it was held that the assessee is entitled to set off of MATcredit against tax liability in the computation of interest payable underSection 234B and Section 234C of the Income Tax Act. Following theabove judgment we dismiss these appeals also filed by the Revenue.Registry will attach a copy of judgment in I.T.A. Nos.353 and 1226 of2009 to form part of this judgment. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge P.S.GOPINATHANJudge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan