Case LawHigh Court › Ita/87/2017 Of M/S Stempeutics Research...

Ita/87/2017 Of M/S Stempeutics Research Pvt Ltd v. The Joint Director Of Income Tax

High Court 17 Feb 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/87/2017 Of M/S Stempeutics Research Pvt Ltd v. The Joint Director Of Income Tax
Date of order
17 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/87/2017 Of M/S Stempeutics Research Pvt Ltd v. The Joint Director Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same in case the occasion so arises.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY I.T.A. NO.87 OF 2017 BETWEEN: M/S STEMPEUTICS RESEARCH PVT. LTD., 9 FLOOR, MANIPAL HOSPITAL, OLD AIRPORT ROAD, RUSTOM BAGH, BENGALURU-560 017 (REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, DR. H.SUDARSHAN BALLAL, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O LATE BELANJE SANJEEVA HEGDE) ...APPELLANT (BY SMT. SUSHMA RAVINDRA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHYTHANYA K.K., ADVOCATE) AND:THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) RANGE-1, 80 FT. ROAD, BMTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA 6 BLOCK, BENGALURU-560 095. (BY SRI. E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 16.09.2016 PASSED IN ITA NOs.1450/BANG/2013 AND 1196/BANG/2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2011-12 & 2012-13 PRAYING TO; (a) FORMULATE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE; (b) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU ‘C’ BENCH BEARING IN ITA NOs.1450/BANG/2013 AND 1196/BANG/2014, DATED 16.09.2016; (c) PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS INCLUDING ORDER AS TO COSTS AS THIS HONORABLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Mrs.Sushma Ravindra, learned counsel for Mr.Chythanya K K, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.E.I.Sanmathi, learned counsel for Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. 2. The aforesaid memo is taken on record. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same in case the occasion so arises. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE GH
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan