Case Law › High Court › Ita/872/2006 Of Commissioenr Of Income T...

Ita/872/2006 Of Commissioenr Of Income Tax Del v. I.s.gambhir

High Court 11 Dec 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

11 Dec 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Ita/872/2006 Of Commissioenr Of Income Tax Del v. I.s.gambhir, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: 87 lacs asmentioned in the order of CIT (A) dated 22.01.2000, as also the letter dated20.11.2019 issued by ACIT, Judicial-2, New Delhi, the tax effect in thepresent appeal being below the permissible tax effect limit, the presentappeal is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~44 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ITA 872/2006COMMISSIOENR OF INCOME TAX DEL..... Appellant ..... Appellant Through:Ms.Vibhooti Malhotra, SeniorStanding Counsel with Mr.SiddharthManocha, Advocate versus I.S.GAMBHIR Through: ..... Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHIHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI O R D E R11.12.2019 % In the light of the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry ofFinance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes (JudicialSection), Government of India, which fixes the monetary limit in respect oftax effect, inter alia, before the High Court in which the Department couldpursue the matter as Rs. 1,00,00,000/-;disallowance of Rs. 87 lacs asmentioned in the order of CIT (A) dated 22.01.2000, as also the letter dated20.11.2019 issued by ACIT, Judicial-2, New Delhi, the tax effect in thepresent appeal being below the permissible tax effect limit, the presentappeal is disposed of. VIPIN SANGHI, J DECEMBER 11, 2019 v REKHA PALLI, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.