Ita/876/2018 Of Sri Mahendrasinh Ramsinh Jadav v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
23 Aug 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/876/2018 Of Sri Mahendrasinh Ramsinh Jadav v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
23 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
2010-2011
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/876/2018 Of Sri Mahendrasinh Ramsinh Jadav v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the memo.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
BETWEEN:
ITA NO.876 OF 2018
SRI MAHENDRASINH RAMSINH JADAV, SON OF SRI RAMSINH JADAV, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.1-104 BRIGADE METROPOLIS, WHITEFIELD MAIN ROAD, PAN: .
BENGALURU-560048. ... APPELLANT
(BY MISS JINITHA CHATARJI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI PARTHASARATHI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 5(3)(5), HMT BHAVAN, BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE-560032. ... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
- - -
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 21.08.2018 PASSED IN ITA NO. 32/BANG/2018, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2010-2011, PRAYING TO:
(A) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE;
(B) SET-ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 21.08.2018 BEARING ITA NO. 32/BANG/2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-2011; AND ETC.,
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DAY,
JUDGMENT
Miss Jinitha Chaterjee, learned counsel for the assessee.
Mr. E.I.Sanmathi, learned counsel for the revenue.
Learned counsel for the assessee file a memo seeking
leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal.
The aforesaid memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the memo.
Sd/- JUDGE
HR
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.