Ita/88/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S M K Agrotech Pvt Ltd
High Court
17 Dec 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/88/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S M K Agrotech Pvt Ltd
Date of order
17 Dec 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/88/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S M K Agrotech Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU
DATBD THIS THR 17 DAY OF DECEMBER, 20109
PRESENT
THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK VINEBT SARAN|
AND
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICK S.SUJATHA
ITA No. 88/2010 C/W ITA NO.89/2010
BRIWEHEN
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,|NO.55/1, SHILPASHREE,VIDYARANYA COMPLEX,|VISHVHBSHWARANAGAR|MYSORKBE.|NO.55/1, SHILPASHREE,VIDYARANYA COMPLEX,|VISHVHBSHWARANAGAR|MYSORKBE.|
2. THR ADDL. COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME TAXRANGE-2, NO.59/1, SHILPASHREE,VIDYARANYA COMPLEX,|VISHVESHWARANAGAR,|RANGE-2, NO.59/1, SHILPASHREE,VIDYARANYA COMPLEX,|VISHVESHWARANAGAR,|
MYSORKBK. _. APPBLLANTS
(COMMON) |
(BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND & MS.PREETHI.J.D-ADVs)
ANT)
M/S M.K. AGROTECH PVT., LTD., |M.B.ROAD, SRIRANGAPATNA,MANDYA DISTRICT. .. RESPONDENT(COMMON) |
MANDYA DISTRICT. .. RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.A.SHANKAR & M.LAVA-ADVs)
THESE IJTAs ARE HILED UNDER SEHECIION J6O00INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDERS—PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA Nos.443/BNG/2009AND 401/BANG/2009 RESPECTIVELY DATED: 30.09.2009, ETC. |
THESE ITAs COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY,
VINEET SARAN J..DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants-Revenue hasplaced before us a recent Circular No.21/2015 dated|10.12.2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct taxes,wherein the monetary limit of the tax eftect for filing appealsbefore the High Court has been enhanced from Rs.10 lacs to |Rs.20 lacs.
In paragraph-10 of the said Circular, it has beenclarified that the same will apply retrospectively to pending|appeals also, which, if below the specified tax limits, may bewithdrawn/not pressed.
2.Learned counsel for the appellants has stated|that the tax effect in the present appeals is below the|specified limit of Rs.20 lacs.
3.Accordingly, in view of the Circular No.21/2015dated 10.12.2015, the tax effect in these appeals being less|than Rs.20 lacs, the appeals standdismissed.
TTL
Sd/- |
JUDGE|
Sd/-.
JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.