In Ita/88/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Dyna Roof Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the above submission made by the department lawyer, the Appeal is disposed of as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA 88/2016
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROYHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAN KUMAR PHUKAN
[Hrishikesh Roy, J.]
This Appeal is filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 260(A) of the Income Tax, 1961 to challenge the verdict of the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal rendered on 15.11.2013 (Annexure-C). However Mr. S. Sarma, the learnedstanding counsel refers to the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 to submit that since the taxable amount in the present case is less than Rs.20 lakh and hence the appellant is under instruction to withdraw the Appeal.
In view of the above submission made by the department lawyer, the Appeal is disposed of as not pressed.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue