Ita/889/2008 Of M/S Shriram Chits Bangalore Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
10 Oct 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/889/2008 Of M/S Shriram Chits Bangalore Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
10 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/889/2008 Of M/S Shriram Chits Bangalore Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as not pressed reservingthe liberty sought for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALOREDATEKD THIS THE 1[‘T]DAY OF OCTOBER 2014|
PRESEHBN
THR HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KUMAR.
AND
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK B. MANOHAR|
ITA No. 889 OF 2008
BETWEEN;
M/S SHRIRAM CHITS (BANGALORE) LTD.,(NOW KNOWN AS SHRIRAM CHITS|(KARNATAKA) (P) LTD.,)RBPRBESENTBD BY ITS BXECUTIVE DIRECTORMR.RONALD D’SOUZAAGEKED ABOUT 46 YRAR“AKSHODAYA’ 10 CROS»s,.1 FLOOR, 10 CROSSWILSON GARDEN,BANGALORE-560 O27.
APPELLANT|
(BY SRILG.SARANGAN, SR. ADV. FOR|ORI. BALRAM R. RAO, ADV.)
AND:
THR ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, CIRCLE-12(2)BANGALORE.
— RBSPONDEBENT
(BY SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADV. )
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER U/S 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 23-05-2008 PASSED IN ITA.NO.601/BNG/2007, FOR THEASSESSMENTYRAR2003-2004|PRAYINGTO
FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW.STATED THRRBIN AND ALLOW THR APPEAL AND SHT|ASIDE;THE|ORDERPASSEDBY|THE.ITAT,BANGALORE IN ITA NO.601/BNG/2007, DATED 23-5-2008 [IS SO FAR AS [TT RBLATES TRATING THDIVIDEND INCOME IS TAXABLE AND IS NOT BXEMPT|UNDEBR THR INCOME TAX ACT.
THIS APPKAL COMING ON FOR HBARING THISDAY,N. AUMAR, J.DBELIVERBED THR FOLLOWING:-
JUDGMENT
The learned senior counsel appearing for theappellant submits that the appellant does not press thisappeal subject to condition if there is any appeal by theRevenue challenging the findings of the Tribunalallowing business loss, in which event, the appellant bereserved the liberty to seek for revival of this appeal.
2 |His submission is placed on record.
The appeal is dismissed as not pressed reservingthe liberty sought for.
Sd/-
JUDGE.
Sd/-|
JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.