Ita/894/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Mahaboob Baig
High Court
08 Nov 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/894/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Mahaboob Baig
Date of order
08 Nov 2012
Assessment year(s)
1998-1999
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/894/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Mahaboob Baig, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE O8 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SREEDHAR RAO|
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO
INCOME-TAX APPEAL NO.894/2007|
BRTWREB
1.THR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXCR BUILDINGCR BUILDING
QUEENS ROAD
BANGALORE
2.THR INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD -5 (2)WARD -5 (2)
CR BUILDINGQUEENS ROADBANGALORE_. APPBELLANTS
(BY SRI. K V ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND
SHRI MAHABOOB BAIG
NO.4, 1 CROSS, S P ROADBANGALORE
—. RBSPONDBENT
(BY SMT. S R ANURADHA, ADV.)
THIS ITA IS FILED U/S.200-A OF LT.ACT, 1961.ARISING OUT OF ORDEBR DATED 18-07-2007 PASSED INITANO.3788/BANG/2004 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR1998-1999, PRAYING THAT THIS HON BLE COURT MAY BE
PLEASEHKD TO
I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OFLAW STATED THEREIN,
Il. ALLOW THR APPBAL AND SET ASIDE THR ORDER.PASSED.BY|THE.ITAT,|BANGALORE,INITA|3788/BANG/2004 DATED 18-07-2007 CONFIRMING THEORDER OF THR APPKELLATK COMMISSIONER & CONFIRMTHE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-5(2), BANGALORE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE|AND EQUITY.
THIS [TA IS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS.DAY,SREEDHAR RAO J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
JU DBGMENT
Learned Counsel for the appellants filed a memo
for withdraw of the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is
dismissed as withdrawn.
Nv]
Sd/-|
JUDGE
Sd/-|
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue