Ita/920/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri H Rajanna
High Court
19 Dec 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/920/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri H Rajanna
Date of order
19 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/920/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri H Rajanna, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 19 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2018.
BEFORE
THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH|
AND|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN)
INCOME TAXK APPEAL NO.920 OF 200
BEI|WEE
1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX|C.R. BUILDING,NAVANAGAR,|BENGALURU.C.R. BUILDING,NAVANAGAR,|BENGALURU.
2 |THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE-15(1),CIRCLE-15(1),
BENGALURU.
.., APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE).
AND
1.SRI H. RAJANNA|
NO.606, 5 MAIN, |
2 CROSS, RBI LAYOUT,
J.P. NAGAR, 7 PHASE,
BENGALURU.
2 |SMT. GEETHA SREEDHAR.NO.13, 1 CROSS,RBI COLONY, 3[ ]JAYANAGAR, NO.13, 1 CROSS,RBI COLONY, 3[ ]JAYANAGAR,
RBI COLONY, 3[ ]BLOCK EAST,
BENGALURU.
3.SRI A.R. BALAKRISHNANNO.503, MAYUR GARDENS,NO.503, MAYUR GARDENS,
28 CROSS,
EJIPURA MAIN ROAD,|
VIVEKNAGAR,
BENGALURU.
AnSMT. GEETHA R. BHALEKAR
NO.363, APOORVA,.
RBI LAYOUT,
J.P. NAGAR VII PHASE,|BENGALURU.BENGALURU.
5,|SRI N. NARAYANANNO.67, RBI LAYOUT,J.P.NAGAR VII PHASE,BENGALURU.NO.67, RBI LAYOUT,J.P.NAGAR VII PHASE,BENGALURU.
6.|SMT. INDRA BAI M.NO.231, 6 CROSS,|17 MAIN, 5 SECTOR,|HSR LAYOUT,BENGALURU.NO.231, 6 CROSS,|17 MAIN, 5 SECTOR,|HSR LAYOUT,BENGALURU.
J.SRI G. RAMAKRISHNANO.252, 1 CROSS,NO.252, 1 CROSS,
( BLOCK, II PHASE, |
BANASHANKARI 3 STAGE,
BENGALURU.
8.|SRI SHEKAR SHETTY
NO.9, MANIKANTA NILAYA,28 ‘A’ MAIN, A.R. LAYOUT,J.P. NAGAR, BENGALURU.28 ‘A’ MAIN, A.R. LAYOUT,J.P. NAGAR, BENGALURU.
9 |SRI |T. DHANDAPANLNOQ.3, GROUND FLOOR,RMS LAYOUT, SANJAYNAGAR,BENGALURU.NOQ.3, GROUND FLOOR,RMS LAYOUT, SANJAYNAGAR,BENGALURU.
10. SRI K.N. NAGARAJA|
NO.308, SIMHA, RBI LAYOUT,
VII PHASE J.P. NAGAR,|BENGALURU.BENGALURU.
11. SRI N. SESHACHALA
NO.429, 5 MAIN, |
( CROSS, RBI LAYOUT,J.P. NAGAR VII PHASE,|BENGALURU.J.P. NAGAR VII PHASE,|BENGALURU.
12. SRI NARASIMHA RAO A.,|
NO.33, II STAGE, VINAYAKA LAYOUT,MARENAHALLI, VISAYANAGAR,BENGALURU.MARENAHALLI, VISAYANAGAR,BENGALURU.
13. SRI N. PRABHAKARANNO.46, LINDEN STREET,AUSTIN TOWN,NO.46, LINDEN STREET,AUSTIN TOWN,
BENGALURU.
14, SRI R. RAMACHANDRAN.NO.17, RBI COLONY,|ANANDANAGAR,BENGALURU.NO.17, RBI COLONY,|ANANDANAGAR,BENGALURU.
4
15. SMT. LEELA SHIVARAMAN.NO.302, DEVI KIRAN APARTMENTS,NEXT TO HOLY GHOST CHURCH,DAVIS RAOD, RICHARDS TOWN,BENGALURU.
.., RESPONDENTS.
* * *
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS. FILED UNDERSECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961,|PRAYING|TO.FORMULATETHE.SUBSTANTIALQUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ALLOW|THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY.THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU|BENCH, IN 1.1T.A. NOS.280, 286, 288, 292, 294, 314,|316,|326,330,339,349,355,|37).AND|438/BANG/2007 DATED 26-6-200/7 AND CONFIRM THEORDER PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER.OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-15(1), BENGALURU.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FORORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH, J., DELIVERED|THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counse!] for the Revenue submits tnat Inidentical matter, as in Income Tax Appeal No.100115)of 2014, was dismissed by the order of this Court dated10-12-2014. Hence, he pleads that following the)aforesaid judgment, the appeal be rejected.
%�
�:.�/@@./7�>6��/33402>1C7B��2>6=>66.2���
��,$���
��������������
��������,$�����������
E;E�
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.