Case LawHigh Court › Ita/9/2024 Of Principal Commissioner Of...

Ita/9/2024 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Kanpur v. Sunil Dandriyal

High Court 24 Feb 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Ita/9/2024 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Kanpur v. Sunil Dandriyal
Date of order
24 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/9/2024 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Kanpur v. Sunil Dandriyal, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Narendar, C.J.**<br>**Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.**<br>1.<br>Sri Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned counsel for the<br>appellant.<br>2.<br>Withdrawal Applications (IA/01/2025) has been<br>filed on behalf of the appellant, praying that this Income<br>Tax Appeal be allowed to be withdrawn.<br>3.<br>Accordingl...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
|||||**2025:UHC:1286-DB**| |---|---|---|---|---| |**SL.**<br>**No**|**Date**|**Office Notes,**<br>**reports, orders**<br>**or proceedings**<br>**or directions and**<br>**Registrar’s order**<br>**with Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**| ||**24.02.2025**|||ITA No. 09 of 2024<br>**Hon’ble G. Narendar, C.J.**<br>**Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.**<br>1.<br>Sri Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned counsel for the<br>appellant.<br>2.<br>Withdrawal Applications (IA/01/2025) has been<br>filed on behalf of the appellant, praying that this Income<br>Tax Appeal be allowed to be withdrawn.<br>3.<br>Accordingly, the Withdrawal Application is allowed,<br>and this Income Tax Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.<br> **(Ashish Naithani, J.) (G. Narendar, C.J.)**<br>**24.02.2025**<br>**24.02.2025**<br>Rahul|
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan