Ita/92/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bosch Limited
High Court
07 Nov 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/92/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bosch Limited
Date of order
07 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/92/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bosch Limited, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
-
ITA No.92/2017 |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 7 DAY QF NOVEMBER 201 / PRESENT|
THE HON‘BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE|
AND
THE HON‘BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR|INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.92/2017
BETWEEN :
1)THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |LTU, JSS TOWERS, BSK III STAGELTU, JSS TOWERS, BSK III STAGE
BENGALURU-560 085
? THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXLTU, JSS TOWERS, BSK III STAGELTU, JSS TOWERS, BSK III STAGE
BENGALURU-560 085.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) |
AND =
M/S.BOSCH LIMITEDHOSUR ROAD, ADUGODIBENGALURU
.. RESPONDENT|
(BY SRI T SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL [IS FILED UNDER SECTION260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE|THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND [TO SET ASIDE THEORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,|BENGALURU IN ITA NO.1211/BANG/2015 DATED 08.09.2016|AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER|CONFIRMING|THE|ORDER|PASSEDBY.THE|DEPUTYCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LTU, BENGALURU.
-2-
-
ITA No.92/2017 |
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS.DAY,|THE|ACTINGCHIEF|JUSTICEDELIVEREDTHE|FOLLOWING:JUDGMENT
Ag.CJ (Oral):
Learned counsel appearing for the appellants has fileda memo dated 25.10.2017 seeking leave to withdraw the|appeal. Leave granted. The appeal is accordingly disposed|of as withdrawn.|
Appeal disposed of.
DKV|
Sd/-—ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.