Ita/924/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Cgi Information Systems
High Court
12 Sep 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/924/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Cgi Information Systems
Date of order
12 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
2003-2004
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/924/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Cgi Information Systems, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: There does not appearany good grounds to interfere with the impugned order,Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. sd/-JUDGE NM* od/-JUDGE
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE
DATED THIS THR 12 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2012
PRESENT
THR HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO
ANT
THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK B.MANOHAR
1.T.A. No.924 OF 2007
BBRITIWE
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle,C.R. Building,Queens Road,Bangalore.
ooThe Income Tax Officer,Ward-19(1),Bangalore.
(By Sri K.V. Aravind, Advocate)
Appellants
ANT)
CGI Information Systems &Management Consultants,38/1, Naganathapura,Electronic City Post,Bangalore-100.
(By Sri K.S. Ramabhadran, Advocate)
Respondent
This I.T.A. is filed U/s.260-A of I.T. Act, 1961 arisingOUTotorderdated06.07.2007passed$&
I.T.A.No.373/BNG/2006 for the Assessment Year 2003-2004, praying that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to(i) formulate the substantial questions of law stated thereinand (11) allow the appeal and set-aside the order of the ITAT,Bangalore in ITA No.373/Bang/2006 dated 06.07.2007confirming the order of the Appellate Commissioner,Bangalore, in the interest of justice and equity.
This appeal is coming on for final hearing this day,SREEDHAR RAO, J.,delivered the following:
JU DBGMENT
The Appellate Tribunal has condoned the delay andremitted the matter to the Commissioner ot [Income Ta(Appeals) for consideration on merits. There does not appearany good grounds to interfere with the impugned order,Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
sd/-JUDGE
NM*
od/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue