Ita/93/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Alapatt Jewels, Alapatt Arcade,M.g.road
High Court
30 Jun 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/93/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Alapatt Jewels, Alapatt Arcade,M.g.road
Date of order
30 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
2004-2005
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/93/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Alapatt Jewels, Alapatt Arcade,M.g.road, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: This appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
&
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/9TH ASHADHA, 1938
I.T.A.No. 93 of 2009
AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 566/2007 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH, DATED 24-10-2008
APPELLANT:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT:
ALAPPAT JEWELS, ALAPPAT ARCADE, M.G. ROAD, KOCHI -35.
R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.ANIL D. NAIR R,R1 BY ADV. SMT.NIVEDITA A.KAMATH
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30-06-2016, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
I.T.A.No. 93 of 2009
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A: COPY OF REASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 26.12.2006 FORTHE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-2005.
ANNEXURE B: COPY OF ORDER DATED 9.4.2007 OF THECOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS).
ANNEXURE C: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 24.10.2008 OF THE INCOMETAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH IN ITA NO.566/COCH/2007.
// TRUE COPY //
P.A. TO JUDGE
ANTONY DOMINIC & P.V.ASHA, JJ.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I.T.A.No.93 of 2009
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 30[th] day of June, 2016
Antony Dominic, J.
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the Revenue calling in question theorder passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Benchin I.T.A.No.566/07 concerning the assessment year 2004-2005.
2. We heard the Senior Counsel for the appellant and thelearned counsel appearing for the respondent assessee.
3. We find that the issues raised in this appeal stand fullyanswered in the judgment of this court in I.T.A.Nos.1341 and1344/09 vide judgment dated 6[th] June, 2016. In the light of the said
judgment, the order passed by the Tribunal is set aside and thematter will stand remitted to the Assessing Officer, who shallconsider the matter afresh as directed in the aforesaid judgment.
: 2 :
The judgment in I.T.A.Nos.1341 and 1344/09 will be annexed to
this judgment.
This appeal is disposed of accordingly.
SD/-
ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE
jes
SD/-
P.V.ASHA JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.