Ita/940/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Rashtriya Nava Nirmana Vedike
High Court
01 Oct 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/940/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Rashtriya Nava Nirmana Vedike
Date of order
01 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
2001-2002
Outcome
Remanded
Case summary
In Ita/940/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Rashtriya Nava Nirmana Vedike, the High Court (2012) remanded the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE
DATBD THIS THR 1 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2012
PRESENT
THR HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO
ANT
THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK B.MANOHAR
1.T.A. No.940 OF 2007
BBRITIWE
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle,C.R. Building,Queens Road,Bangalore.
ooThe Assistant Director of Income Tax(Exemptions),Circle-177(2)C.R. Building,Queens Road,Bangalore.
Appellants
(By Sri K.V. Aravind, Advocate)
AND:
M/s.Rashtriya Nava Nirmana Vedike,6, 7, 8 VSK Printers,(Next to Police Station,Shankarmatt,Bangalore-04.
(By Sri A. Shankar & Sri M. Lava, Advocates)
Respondent
This I.T.A. is filed U/s.200-A of the I.T. Act, 1961arising out of Order dated 26.06.2007 passed in ITANo.84/BNG/2005, for the Assessment Year 2001-2002,praying that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to;(i) formulate the substantial questions of law stated thereinand (11) allow the appeal and set aside the order passed bythe.ITATBangaloreinITA|No.84/BNG/2005,/*,!/26.06.2007|contirmtheordersottheAppellateCommissioner confirming the order passed by the AssistantDirector of Income Tax (Exemptions), Circle-17(2), Bangalore,
This appeal is coming on for final hearing this day,SREEDHAR RAO, J.,delivered the following:
JU DBGMENT
M/s.A.Shankar and M.Lava takes notice for therespondent.
In view of the decision ot this Court in IIANo.941/2007, the order of the Appellate Tribunal is setaside. The matter is remanded to the Assessing Officer forfresh assessments. The liberty is given to the respondent toraise all the contentions permitted in law.
od/-JUDGE
od/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.