Ita/941/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) - 1 v. Shri Shiv Priya
High Court
07 Nov 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/941/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) - 1 v. Shri Shiv Priya
Date of order
07 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/941/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) - 1 v. Shri Shiv Priya, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.The Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~23
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ITA 941/2017PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX (CENTRAL) – 1
..... Appellant
Through :Mr Sanjay Kumar and Mr RahulChaudhary, Advocates.
versus
SHRI SHIV PRIYA
..... Respondent
Through :None.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHATHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVAO R D E R%07.11.2017
1.The Revenue urges that the deletion of Rs.1,46,38,000/-, brought totax as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act,1961, was not justified in the circumstances.
2.This Court notices that the amounts were added, pursuant toassessment as a consequence of the search undertaken after which noticewas issued under Section 153A.The Tribunal merely followed thedecision of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax versus KabulChawla, 380 ITR 573 holding that in the absence of incriminating material,the Assessing Officer could not have re-opened the complete assessment.Therefore, no question of law arises.
3.The Appeal is dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
NOVEMBER 07, 2017/‘Sn’
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.