Case LawHigh Court › Ita/942/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Ita/942/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-07 v. Ray Ban Sun Optics India Ltd.gurgaon

High Court 15 May 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/942/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-07 v. Ray Ban Sun Optics India Ltd.gurgaon
Date of order
15 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/942/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-07 v. Ray Ban Sun Optics India Ltd.gurgaon, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 942/2016COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-07 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar & Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Advocates versus RAY BAN SUN OPTICS INDIA LTD.GURGAON..... Respondent Through CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R% 15.05.2017 CM No. 47689/2016 1. For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed. The delay of 105 days in re-filing the present appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of. ITA No. 942/2016 2. This is an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) dated 15[th] April, 2014 in ITA No. 672/Del/2013 for the Assessment Year 2009-10. 3. It is seen from the impugned order of the ITAT that the matter has been remanded to the Assessing Officer (‘AO’) / Transfer Pricing Officer (‘TPO’)in conformity with the decision of the Special Bench of the ITAT in LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT 2013 152 TTJ (Del) (SB) 273. 4. It is clarified that the said opinion of the ITAT no longer being good law in view of the decision of this Court in Sony Eriksson Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2015) 374 ITR 118, the AO/TPO will have to consider the matter afresh in light of the said decision. 5. The appeal is dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J MAY 15, 2017 tp CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan