Ita/944/2008 Of The Commr Of Income Tax v. M/S Sonata Information Technology Ltd
High Court
14 Aug 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/944/2008 Of The Commr Of Income Tax v. M/S Sonata Information Technology Ltd
Date of order
14 Aug 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/944/2008 Of The Commr Of Income Tax v. M/S Sonata Information Technology Ltd, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 14 DAY OF AUGUST 2012
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR
ITA No.944/2008
BETWEEN :
1 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATIONRASTROTHANA BUILDINGNRUPATHUNGA ROADBANGALORE.INTERNATIONAL TAXATIONRASTROTHANA BUILDINGNRUPATHUNGA ROADBANGALORE.
2 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)WARD-11 (1), RASTROTHANA BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROADBANGALORE.
.. APPELLANTS
(By Sri K V ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND :
M/S SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LTDNO.193, I FLOOR, R V ROADBASAVANAGUDIBANGALORE
...RESPONDENT
(By Smt.VANI H, ADV.)
This ITA is filed under Section 260A of the IT Act, praying to set aside the order dated 30.4.2008 in ITA.No.146/BANG/2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore and the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-IV, Bangalore.
This ITA coming on for final hearing this day, K.SREEDHAR RAO, J, delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
In view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax & anr. -vs- Samsung Electronics Co.
Ltd. & ors. reported in (2011) 245 CTR (Kar) 481, the questions of law are answered in favour of the revenue. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
bkm.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.