Case LawHigh Court › Ita/946/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/946/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Trichur v. South Indian Bank Ltd., Trichur

High Court 09 Oct 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/946/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Trichur v. South Indian Bank Ltd., Trichur
Date of order
09 Oct 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/946/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Trichur v. South Indian Bank Ltd., Trichur, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Consequently the departmental appeal is dismissed (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN FRIDAY, THE 9TH OCTOBER 2009 / 17TH ASWINA 1931 ITA.No. 946 of 2009() --------------------- ITA.36/COCH/2001 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT: -------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRICHUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): --------------- SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., TRICHUR. ADV. SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E) THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K. MOHANAN, JJ. -------------------------------------------- I.T.A. No. 946 OF 2009 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of October, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. The respondent-assessee is a Bank which purchased securities atmarket value above the face value. Admittedly when the securitieswere redeemed, respondent will be entitled to get only face value.Consequently, the loss arising on account of purchase at market valueis written off in instalments by spreading over the same equally forevery year until date of maturity. We are of the view that the Tribunalrightly upheld the assessee's entitlement to write-off of the loss ininstalments. Consequently the departmental appeal is dismissed (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge. (V.K. MOHANAN) Judge. kk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan