In Ita/95/1998 Of The Commissiner Of Income Tax v. Smt. Usha Hiranand Gulrajani, Mumbai, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
1 ita-95-98
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPLICACTION NO.95 OF 1998
The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Mumbai
..Applicant.
V/s.
Smt. Usha Hiranan Gurajani
..Respondent.
None for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 5TH DECEMBER, 2011
P.C. :-
None present for the applicant. Even on the last date i.e. 28/11/2011 none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Hence the application is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.R. JOSHI, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue