Case LawHigh Court › Ita/95/2020 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/95/2020 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Manthan Software Services Pvt Ltd

High Court 15 Dec 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/95/2020 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Manthan Software Services Pvt Ltd
Date of order
15 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/95/2020 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Manthan Software Services Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 15[TH|]DAY OF DECEMBER 2020. PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASADLT.A. NO.95 OF 2020 BEITWEEN 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX. INTERNATIONAL TAXATION. 71H FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560095., 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE-1(2), 7TH FLOOR BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095. _.., APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ARAVIND K.V. ADV.,) AND M/S. MANTHAN SOFTWARE SERVICES PVT. LTD., NO,.40/4, LAVELLE ROADBENGALURU-560001PAN AADCM 7/7/50 M .., RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NARENDRA KUMAR J. JAIN, ADV.,) THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. 260-A OF INCOME|TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 28.08.2019PASSED|IN|ITCIT)ANO.968/BANG/2019FOR|THE|ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13, PRAYING TO: (1) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF.LAW STATED ABOVE. (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERSPASSED|BY|THE|INCOME-TAXAPPELLATETRIBUNAL,|BENGALURUIN|ITCIT)ANO.968/BANG/2019DATED28.08.2019 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13, ANNEXURE-CCONFIRMINGTHE|ORDER.OF|THE|APPELLATECOMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE|DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIOALTAXATION, CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU & ETC. THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS—DAY,ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Mr.Narendra Kumar J.Jain, learned counsel for the.aSse@ess€e ?. Learned counsel for the assessee submits that the|tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.1 Crore and therefore,the appeal should not be entertained at the instance of therevenue in view of the Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. It Is also}submitted that the aforesaid Circular binds the revenue. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the revenue.submits that ne be granted liberty to revive the appeal incase the matter falls within the exceptions under theaforesaid Circular dated 08.08.2019. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the appeal isdisposed of with liberty as prayed for by the learned counselfor the revenue. Sd/-JUDGESd/-JUDGE RV
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan