Case LawHigh Court › Ita/96/2013 Of Comnr.of Income Tax v. M/...

Ita/96/2013 Of Comnr.of Income Tax v. M/S.patnaik Minerals

High Court 21 Feb 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Ita/96/2013 Of Comnr.of Income Tax v. M/S.patnaik Minerals
Date of order
21 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/96/2013 Of Comnr.of Income Tax v. M/S.patnaik Minerals, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Order No. 4. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ITA No.96 of 2013 ….Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar Mr. S.S. Mohapatra, Sr. S.C, Income Tax -versus- ….RespondentMr. A. Mohanty, Advocate M/s. Patnaik Minreals Pvt. Ltd CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK ORDER 21.02.2022 1. The Department is an appeal against the order dated 22[nd]February, 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellant Tribunal in ITA No.31/CTK/2013 for the AY 2009-10. 2. The question sought to be urged in the present appeal concerns allowing the claim of the Assessee as expenses under the head ‘over burden cutting and removal charges’. 3. A contention of the Department is that, such expenses fell within the scope of Section 35-E of the Act. Having perused the impugned order of the ITAT and having heard learned counsel for the Department, the Court is of the view that issues was decided by the ITAT on facts and by concurring with the CIT(A). T.TUDU Consequently, the Court finds no substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R. K. Pattanaik) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan