Case Law › High Court › Ita/963/2005 Of The Comm. Jof Income Tax...

Ita/963/2005 Of The Comm. Jof Income Tax Delhi v. The Installment Supply Co

High Court 11 Dec 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

11 Dec 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Ita/963/2005 Of The Comm. Jof Income Tax Delhi v. The Installment Supply Co, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~39 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ITA 963/2005THE COMM. JOF INCOME TAX DELHI..... Appellant ..... AppellantThrough:Ms.Vibhooti Malhotra, SeniorStanding Counsel with Mr.SiddharthManocha, Advocate versus THE INSTALLMENT SUPPLY CO Through: ..... Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHIHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLIO R D E R%11.12.2019 1. Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, learned Senior Standing counsel for the Appellanton instructions state that the tax effect is below Rs. 1 crore in view ofnotification. 2. In the light of the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry ofFinance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes (JudicialSection), Government of India, which fixes the monetary limit in respect oftax effect, inter alia, before the High Court in which the Department couldpursue the matter as Rs. 1,00,00,000/-, the tax effect in the present appealbeing below the permissible tax effect limit, the present appeal is disposedof. VIPIN SANGHI, J DECEMBER 11, 2019/v REKHA PALLI, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.