Case LawHigh Court › Ita/972/2017 Of Mrs Latha Puttanna v. Th...

Ita/972/2017 Of Mrs Latha Puttanna v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 07 Apr 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/972/2017 Of Mrs Latha Puttanna v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
07 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
2011-2012
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/972/2017 Of Mrs Latha Puttanna v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty to revive the same, in case occasion so arises.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7 DAY OF APRIL, 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL BETWEEN: I.T.A. NO.972/2017 MRS. LATHA PUTTANNA PROPRIETRIX: SHRISHTI # 592, UPPER PALACE ORCHARD, OPP: SWIMMING POOL, SADASHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 080 PAN: (BY SRI V.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI M. LAVA, ADVOCATE) ...APPELLANT AND: THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRLCE-8(1), PRESENTLY CIRCLE-6(3)(1), BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, 6TH BLOCK, BENGALURU-560 095 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI DILEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX APPEAL ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED:07/07/2017 PASSED IN ITA NO.1691/BANG/2016, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012 PRAYING (i) TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT (ii) TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU 'C' BENCH, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.1691(BANG)2016 DATED:07/07/2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012 (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Shri V.Chandrashekar, learned counsel for Shri M.Lava, learned counsel for the assessee. Shri Dileep Kumar, learned counsel for Shri K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The aforesaid memo is taken on record. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty to revive the same, in case occasion so arises. Sd/- JUDGE CA Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan