Case Law › High Court › Ita/977/2019 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/977/2019 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Exemption v. Iilm Foundation

High Court 04 Dec 2019 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

04 Dec 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/977/2019 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Exemption v. Iilm Foundation, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~44 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ITA 977/2019THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -EXEMPTION ..... Appellant Through:Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Senior StandingCounsel with Ms. Madhura M.N.,Advocate. versus IILM FOUNDATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal, Advocate. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHIHON’BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLIO R D E R%04.12.2019 C.M. No. 52144/2019 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. ITA 977/2019 & CM APPL. 52145/2019 3. Mr. Ruchir Bhatia learned counsel for the Appellant on instructions and inlight of the decision of this Court in Lachman Dass Bhatia v. AssistantCommissioner of Income Tax 2015 5 ITR-OL 360 (Delhi) , seeksleave to withdraw the present appeal with a liberty to prefer a writ petition tochallenge the impugned order passed by the ITAT dated 28.02.2019. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sprayed for. VIPIN SANGHI, J DECEMBER 04, 2019/nk REKHA PALLI, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.