Case LawHigh Court › Ita/98/2016 Of The Principal Commissione...

Ita/98/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.p.p.ummerkutty

High Court 09 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/98/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.p.p.ummerkutty
Date of order
09 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/98/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.p.p.ummerkutty, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON TUESDAY ,THE 09TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 17TH ASWINA, 1940 ITA.No. 98 of 2016 AGAINST THE ORDER IN OTHERS 1/2013 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHINBENCH DATED 09-03-2016 FOR BLOCK PERIOD 1987-88 TO 1997-98 APPELLANT/S: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAAYAKARBHAVAN, RESIDENCY ROAD, MYSURU, PIN-570010. BY ADVS.SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENTSRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT RESPONDENT/S: SHRI.P.P.UMMERKUTTYAGRI VILLAGE, BETTALI POST, VIRAJPET, KODAGU BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIRKUM.MEKHALA M.BENNYKUM.SOUMYA PRAKASHSRI.R.SREEJITH THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09.10.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ::2 :: JUDGMENT The learned Senior Counsel submits that theappeal is not maintainable due to the litigation policyframed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. In suchcircumstance, the appeal is permitted to be withdrawnleaving open the question of law. Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRANJUDGE Sd/- ASHOK MENONJUDGE ITA No.98/2016 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE ATRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 5.3.1999 PASSED BY THE DY. COMMISSIONEROF INCOME-TAX, INVESTIGATION CIRCLE, CALICUT5.3.1999 PASSED BY THE DY. COMMISSIONEROF INCOME-TAX, INVESTIGATION CIRCLE, CALICUT ANNEXURE BTRUE COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX (APPEALS), COCHIN ON 23.7.1999THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX (APPEALS), COCHIN ON 23.7.1999 ANNEXURE CTRUE COPY OF ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ON 28.12.2001INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ON 28.12.2001 ANNEXURE DTRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 3.11.2009 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURTPASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT ANNEXURE ETRUE COPY OF PENALTY ORDER DATED 8.7.2002 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX8.7.2002 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANNEXURE FTRUE COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER DATED 5.1.2005 PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)5.1.2005 PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS) ANNEXURE GTRUE COPY OF TRIBUNAL'S ORDER DATED 27.4.200727.4.2007 ANNEXURE HTRUE COPY OF PENALTY ORDER DATED 27.9.201027.9.2010 ANNEXURE ITRUE COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER DATED 21.11.201221.11.2012 ANNEXURE JTRUE COPY OF APPEAL FORM NO.36 WITH GROUNDS OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE TRIBUNALGROUNDS OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL ANNEXURE KCERTIFIED COPY OF INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 9.3.2016TRIBUNAL DATED 9.3.2016
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan