Case LawHigh Court › Ita/98/2017 Of Sanyo Bpl Pvt Ltd v. The...

Ita/98/2017 Of Sanyo Bpl Pvt Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 01 Aug 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/98/2017 Of Sanyo Bpl Pvt Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
01 Aug 2017
Assessment year(s)
2006-2007
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/98/2017 Of Sanyo Bpl Pvt Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Decision: Tne appeal is accordingly|disposed of as abated.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

- ITA No.98/201/7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 1 DAY OF AUGUST 2Q1/PRESENT| THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESHAND THE HON‘'BLE MRS, JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.98/ 201 BETWEEN : SANYO BPL PVT. LTD..NO.404/2, 7 MAIN, 9 CROSSNO.404/2, 7 MAIN, 9 CROSS 2 BLOCK, JAYANAGAR_ BANGALORE-560 O11 (JUBILEE BUILDING, II FLOOR> NO.45, MUSEUM ROADBANGALORE- 560 025).REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITSLIQUIDATORBANGALORE- 560 025).REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITSLIQUIDATOR MR,DUSHYANTHA KUMAR| ...APPELLAN T (BY SRI SANDEEP HUILGOL, FOR SRI SURYANARAYANA T. ADVOCATES) AND : 1.|THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME-TAX — CIRCLE 12(3)INCOME-TAX — CIRCLE 12(3) BANGALOREBMIC BUILDINGKORAMANGALA 6 BLOCKBANGALORE 560 095BMIC BUILDINGKORAMANGALA 6 BLOCKBANGALORE 560 095 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX | BANGALORE BMTC BUILDINGKORAMANGALA 6 BLOCKKORAMANGALA 6 BLOCK BANGALORE 560 095 RESPONDENTS - ITA No.98/201/7 THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL [IS FILED UNDER SECTION260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE SUBSTANTIAL|QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER|DATED:04.11.2016 PASSED BY THE ITAT ‘A’ BENCH IN ITA)NO.1395/BANG/2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-2007. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION,|THIS DAY, H.G.RAMESH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)" Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the.appeal abates in view of the order of this Court dated|20.04.2017 passed in OLR No.15/2016 dissolving the)appellant-company. A memo dated 01.08.2017 is filed in|Court along with a copy of the aforesaid order dated.20.04.2017 passed by this Court in OLR No.15/2016. Tne)Same is placed on record. Tne appeal is accordingly|disposed of as abated. Appeal disposed of. DM| Sd/-'| JUDGE Sd/-'| JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan