Ita/99/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shri. Kiran Kumar
High Court
08 Mar 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/99/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shri. Kiran Kumar
Date of order
08 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/99/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shri. Kiran Kumar, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 08 DAY OF MARCH, 2016
PRESENT
THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL.
AND|
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA|
I.T.A. NO.99/2015
BETWEEN:
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,C.R. BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE.
2.|THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER,WARD-7(2),KENDRIYA SADAN,( FLOOR, B & C WING,1/ MAIN, KORAMANGALA,|BANGALORE - 560 034. |
.., APPELLANTS
(BY SRI: K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)|
AND:
SHRI. KIRAN KUMAR,NO./7//, MAIN,|1 CROSS, CHOWDESHWARI LAYOUT,MARATHAHALLI, BANGALORE,PAN: ARJPK1LO614J... RESPONDENT|
(BY SRI: T.N. VISWANATHA, ADVOCATE)
OK OK
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.2Z60-A OF INCOME TAXACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED:31/10/2014|PASSED IN ITA NO.6/BANG/2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR|2009-2010 AND ETC.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS_ DAY,JAYANT PATEL J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING :-
JUDGMENT
When the matter is taken up for consideration, Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel appearing for the appellant.fairly concedes that the tax effect in the present appeal is)of Rs.15,85,249/-. As per the Circular No.21/2015 dated10/12/2015 issued by the CBDT, where the tax effect isRs.20,00,000/- or less in the appeals before the highcourts, such appeals are not to be pressed. Hence, he)does not press the present appeal.
2.AppealISdisposedOT|as|notpressed. |However, it is observed that the question raised in the}present appeal snall remain open.
Sd/-'
JUDGE
Sd/-"
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue