Ita.crob/1/2012 Of Shri Ashok Kumar Malpani v. The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
05 Jun 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita.crob/1/2012 Of Shri Ashok Kumar Malpani v. The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
05 Jun 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita.crob/1/2012 Of Shri Ashok Kumar Malpani v. The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5 DAY OF JUNE, 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
ITA.CROB NO.1 OF 2012 INITA NO.202 OF 2011
BETWEEN:
SHRI. ASHOK KUMAR MALPANI AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS SON OF SRI.HARI KISHEN MALPANI
NO.45, INDUSTRY HOUSE RACE COURSE ROAD BANGALORE.
… CROSS OBJECTOR
(BY SMT. JINITA CHATTERJEE FOR SRI S. PARTHASARATHI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(2) BANGALORE.
… RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. JEEVAN J.NEERALGI)
THIS ITA.CROB IN ITA NO.202/2011 IS FILED UNDER SECTION ORDER XLI, RULE 22 OF CPC, 1908, ARISING
OUT OF ORDER DATED 23.02.2011, FOR THE ASSESSMENT FOR THE BLOCK PERIOD 01.04.1996 TO 21.12.2002 (ANNEXURE-A), PRAYING TO (I) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN, (II) ALLOW THE CROSS OBJECTION APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE CROSS-OBJECTOR IN THE ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL IN IT(SS)A NO.36/BANG/2008 DATED 23.02.2011 ON THE VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE BLOCK PERIOD 01.04.1996 TO 21.12.2002 (ANNEXURE-A) IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS ITA CROB COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the parties fairly submitted
that the cross objection is not maintainable.
In view of the aforesaid submission, cross
objection is dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue